Finding subsets of positive measure

From MaRDI portal



Abstract: An important theorem of geometric measure theory (first proved by Besicovitch and Davies for Euclidean space) says that every analytic set of non-zero s-dimensional Hausdorff measure mathcalHs contains a closed subset of non-zero (and indeed finite) mathcalHs-measure. We investigate the question how hard it is to find such a set, in terms of the index set complexity, and in terms of the complexity of the parameter needed to define such a closed set. Among other results, we show that given a (lightface) Sigma11 set of reals in Cantor space, there is always a Pi10(mathcalO) subset on non-zero mathcalHs-measure definable from Kleene's mathcalO. On the other hand, there are Pi20 sets of reals where no hyperarithmetic real can define a closed subset of non-zero measure.












This page was built for publication: Finding subsets of positive measure

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6253789)