Fooling sets and the spanning tree polytope
From MaRDI portal
Abstract: In the study of extensions of polytopes of combinatorial optimization problems, a notorious open question is that for the size of the smallest extended formulation of the Minimum Spanning Tree problem on a complete graph with nodes. The best known lower bound is , the best known upper bound is . In this note we show that the venerable fooling set method cannot be used to improve the lower bound: every fooling set for the Spanning Tree polytope has size .
Recommendations
Cites work
- A comparison of two lower-bound methods for communication complexity
- Combinatorial bounds on nonnegative rank and extended formulations
- Communication Complexity
- Extended formulations in combinatorial optimization
- Fooling sets and the spanning tree polytope
- Fooling-sets and rank
- Fooling-sets and rank in nonzero characteristic
- Smaller extended formulations for the spanning tree polytope of bounded-genus graphs
- Symmetry Matters for Sizes of Extended Formulations
- The (minimum) rank of typical fooling-set matrices
- Using separation algorithms to generate mixed integer model reformulations
Cited in
(7)- Fooling sets and the spanning tree polytope
- Smaller extended formulations for spanning tree polytopes in minor-closed classes and beyond
- The rectangle covering number of random Boolean matrices
- On the combinatorial lower bound for the extension complexity of the spanning tree polytope
- Fooling Polytopes
- Fooling polytopes
- Smaller extended formulations for the spanning tree polytope of bounded-genus graphs
This page was built for publication: Fooling sets and the spanning tree polytope
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1705643)