Free versus constrained evolution of the 2+1 equivariant wave map
From MaRDI portal
Abstract: We compare the numerical solutions of the 2+1 equivariant Wave Map problem computed with the symplectic, constraint respecting Rattle algorithm and the well known fourth order Runge-Kutta method. We show the advantages of the Rattle algorithm for constrained system compared to the free evolution with the Runge-Kutta method. We also present an expression, which represents the energy loss due to constraint violation. Taking this expression into account we can achieve energy conservation for the Runge-Kutta scheme, which is better than with the Rattle method. Using the symplectic scheme with constraint enforcement we can reproduce previous calculations of the equivariant case without imposing the symmetry explicitly, thereby confirming that the critical behaviour is stable.
Recommendations
- Equivariant wave maps in two space dimensions
- Constrained wave equations and wave maps
- On equivariant self-similar wave maps
- Near soliton evolution for equivariant Schrödinger maps in two spatial dimensions
- Blow-up of the nonequivariant (2+1)-dimensional wave map
- Equivariant Schrödinger maps in two spatial dimensions
- Equivariant wave maps on the hyperbolic plane with large energy
- Formation of singularities for equivariant (2+1)-dimensional wave maps into the 2-sphere
- 2-equivariant solution to the equivalent equation in the Schrödinger map equation
- Wave maps on \((1+2)\)-dimensional curved spacetimes
Cited in
(2)
This page was built for publication: Free versus constrained evolution of the 2+1 equivariant wave map
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3118837)
