Hardness of permutation pattern matching

From MaRDI portal



Abstract: Permutation Pattern Matching (or PPM) is a decision problem whose input is a pair of permutations pi and au, represented as sequences of integers, and the task is to determine whether au contains a subsequence order-isomorphic to pi. Bose, Buss and Lubiw proved that PPM is NP-complete on general inputs. We show that PPM is NP-complete even when pi has no decreasing subsequence of length 3 and au has no decreasing subsequence of length 4. This provides the first known example of PPM being hard when one or both of pi and sigma are restricted to a proper hereditary class of permutations. This hardness result is tight in the sense that PPM is known to be polynomial when both pi and au avoid a decreasing subsequence of length 3, as well as when pi avoids a decreasing subsequence of length 2. The result is also tight in another sense: we will show that for any hereditary proper subclass C of the class of permutations avoiding a decreasing sequence of length 3, there is a polynomial algorithm solving PPM instances where pi is from C and au is arbitrary. We also obtain analogous hardness and tractability results for the class of so-called skew-merged patterns. From these results, we deduce a complexity dichotomy for the PPM problem restricted to pi belonging to Av(ho), where Av(ho) denotes the class of permutations avoiding a permutation ho. Specifically, we show that the problem is polynomial when ho is in the set {1, 12, 21, 132, 213, 231, 312}, and it is NP-complete for any other ho.












This page was built for publication: Hardness of permutation pattern matching

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4575761)