Hartung-Knapp method is not always conservative compared with fixed-effect meta-analysis

DOI10.1002/SIM.6879MaRDI QIDQ6953104zbMATH OpenFDO

Authors Anna Wiksten, Gerta Rücker, Guido Schwarzer

Publication date 25 July 2025

Published in Statistics in Medicine (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1002/SIM.6879

zbMATH Keywords

DerSimonian-Laird methodempirical evaluationHartung-Knapp methodmeta-analysis

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis (62P10)

Cites work

• A refined method for multivariate meta-analysis and meta-regression
• An Alternative Method for Meta-Analysis
• Consensus Values and Weighting Factors
• Detecting and adjusting for small‐study effects in meta‐analysis

Cited in

(2)

• The Hartung-Knapp modification for random-effects meta-analysis: a useful refinement but are there any residual concerns?
• Multistep estimators of the between-study variance: the relationship with the Paule-Mandel estimator

This page was built for publication: Hartung-Knapp method is not always conservative compared with fixed-effect meta-analysis

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6953104)