Haunted quantum contextuality versus value indefiniteness
From MaRDI portal
Abstract: Physical entities are ultimately (re)constructed from elementary yes/no events, in particular clicks in detectors or measurement devices recording quanta. Recently, the interpretation of certain such clicks has given rise to unfounded claims which are neither necessary nor sufficient, although they are presented in that way. In particular, clicks can neither inductively support nor "(dis)prove" the Kochen-Specker theorem, which is a formal result that has a deductive proof by contradiction. More importantly, the alleged empirical evidence of quantum contextuality, which is "inferred" from violations of bounds of classical probabilities by quantum correlations, is based on highly nontrivial assumptions, in particular on physical omniscience.
Recommendations
- Roots and (re)sources of value (in)definiteness \textit{versus} contextuality
- Is quantum mechanics contextual?
- The problem of contextuality and the impossibility of experimental metaphysics thereof
- Kochen-Specker meets experiments
- Unscrambling the omelette of quantum contextuality. I: Preexistent properties or measurement outcomes?
Cites work
- Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?
- Finite Precision Measurement Nullifies the Kochen-Specker Theorem
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3451986 (Why is no real title available?)
- On the Problem of Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics
- Quantum information via state partitions and the context translation principle
- Violation of a Bell-like inequality in single-neutron interferometer experiments: quantum contextuality
Cited in
(3)
This page was built for publication: Haunted quantum contextuality versus value indefiniteness
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2891320)