How Not to Change the Theory of Theory Change: A Reply to Tennant

DOI10.1093/BJPS/46.3.361MaRDI QIDQ4940880zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Sven Ove Hansson, Hans Rott

Publication date 13 March 2000

Published in The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/46.3.361

zbMATH Keywords

belief basesbelief statesidealized rational agentlogic of belief changerecovery

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) Logics of knowledge and belief (including belief change) (03B42)

Recommendations

• A Plea for Accuracy
• The AGM theory and inconsistent belief change
• Ten Philosophical Problems in Belief Revision
• AGM 25 years. Twenty-five years of research in belief change
• Beyond recovery? A reply to Tennant. A critical discussion

Cited in

(5)

• On the logic of theory change: Contraction without recovery
• On having bad contractions, or: no room for recovery
• A Plea for Accuracy
• Notes on the history of ideas behind AGM
• Handling inconsistency in knowledge systems

This page was built for publication: How Not to Change the Theory of Theory Change: A Reply to Tennant

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4940880)