How constructive is constructing measures?
From MaRDI portal
Abstract: Given some set, how hard is it to construct a measure supported by it? We classify some variations of this task in the Weihrauch lattice. Particular attention is paid to Frostman measures on sets with positive Hausdorff dimension. As a side result, the Weihrauch degree of Hausdorff dimension itself is determined.
Recommendations
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2225918
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3882669
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 934594
- What can we measure?
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4000267
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4038144
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3106387
- On the notion of measurability
Cites work
- A topological view on algebraic computation models
- Admissible representations for probability measures
- Computability on computable metric spaces
- Computability on subsets of metric spaces.
- Finite choice, convex choice and finding roots
- Fourier spectra of measures associated with algorithmically random Brownian motion
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3941840 (Why is no real title available?)
- New Computational Paradigms
- On the algebraic structure of Weihrauch degrees
- On the computational content of the Brouwer fixed point theorem
- Real hypercomputation and continuity
- Recursive characterization of computable real-valued functions and relations
- Representing measurement results
- Theory of representations
- Universal measure zero, large Hausdorff dimension, and nearly Lipschitz maps
- Weihrauch degrees of finding equilibria in sequential games
Cited in
(4)
This page was built for publication: How constructive is constructing measures?
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2987777)