How stringent is the linear independence kink qualification in abs-smooth optimization?
From MaRDI portal
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3632234 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3300175 (Why is no real title available?)
- Characterizing and testing subdifferential regularity in piecewise smooth optimization
- Differential Topology
- First- and second-order optimality conditions for piecewise smooth objective functions
- How Stringent is the Linear Independence Assumption for Mathematical Programs with Complementarity Constraints?
- Introduction to Smooth Manifolds
- MPCC: critical point theory
- Mathematical programs with vanishing constraints: critical point theory
- Nonlinear optimization in finite dimensions. Morse theory, Chebyshev approximation, transversality, flows, parametric aspects
- On first and second order optimality conditions for ABS-normal NLP
- On intrinsic complexity of Nash equilibrium problems and bilevel optimization
- On nondegenerate M-stationary points for sparsity constrained nonlinear optimization
- On stable piecewise linearization and generalized algorithmic differentiation
- Relations between ABS-normal NLPs and MPCCs. I: Strong constraint qualifications
- Solving piecewise linear systems in ABS-normal form
- The Generic Nature of Optimality Conditions in Nonlinear Programming
- The structured jet transversality theorem†
This page was built for publication: How stringent is the linear independence kink qualification in abs-smooth optimization?
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6866231)