How to handle topography in practical geoid determination: three examples.

DOI10.1007/S001900000107MaRDI QIDQ1862549zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors O. C. D. Omang, Rolf Forsberg

Publication date 2000

Published in Journal of Geodesy (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s001900000107

zbMATH Keywords

indirect effectsresidual terrain modelterrain effects

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Geodesy, mapping problems (86A30)

Recommendations

• Review and numerical assessment of the direct topographical reduction in geoid determination.
• Topographic effects by the Stokes-Helmert method of geoid and quasi-geoid determinations.
• On Helmert's methods of condensation.
• The direct topographical correction in gravimetric geoid determination by the Stokes-Helmert method.
• On the indirect effect in the Stokes-Helmert method of geoid determination

Cited in

(5)

• Geoid height determination by artificial neural networks and collocation
• Review and numerical assessment of the direct topographical reduction in geoid determination.
• The Rudzki inversion gravimetric reduction scheme in geoid determination
• On Helmert's methods of condensation.
• Astronomical-topographic levelling using high-precision astrogeodetic vertical deflections and digital terrain model data

This page was built for publication: How to handle topography in practical geoid determination: three examples.

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1862549)