INCOMPATIBILITY OF GENERIC HUGENESS PRINCIPLES
From MaRDI portal
Abstract: We show that the weakest versions of Foreman's minimal generic hugeness axioms cannot hold simultaneously on adjacent cardinals. Moreover, conventional forcing techniques cannot produce a model of one of these axioms.
Recommendations
- GENERICITY AND LARGE CARDINALS
- Generic incompleteness of formal arithmetic
- Generalizations of the Kunen inconsistency
- Incompatible Ω-Complete Theories
- Generic undecidability of universal theories
- Generic impossibility of Arrow's impossibility theorem
- Incompactness in regular cardinals
- GENERIC LARGE CARDINALS AS AXIOMS
- Reflection principles, generic large cardinals, and the continuum problem
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3904643
Cites work
- Compactness versus hugeness at successor cardinals
- Easton collapses and a strongly saturated filter
- Extensions with the approximation and cover properties have no new large cardinals
- GENERIC LARGE CARDINALS AS AXIOMS
- Generic large cardinals: New axioms for mathematics?
- Has the continuum hypothesis been settled?
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3851073 (Why is no real title available?)
- Ideals and generic elementary embeddings
- Iterated forcing and elementary embeddings
- On the Existence of Nonregular Ultrafilters and the Cardinality of Ultrapowers
- Potent Axioms
This page was built for publication: INCOMPATIBILITY OF GENERIC HUGENESS PRINCIPLES
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6170501)
