Identifying efficient abductive hypotheses using multicriteria dominance relation
From MaRDI portal
Recommendations
Cites work
- A Formal Logic for Abductive Reasoning
- Abduction in classification tasks
- Abductive cognition. The epistemological and eco-cognitive dimensions of hypothetical reasoning
- Abductive reasoning. Logical investigations into discovery and explanation
- Are tableaux an improvement on truth-tables? Cut-free proofs and bivalence
- Evolutionary Algorithms for Solving Multi-Objective Problems
- First order abduction via tableau and sequent calculi
- Handbook of metaheuristics
- Handbook of proof theory
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5194680 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1962077 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1926642 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 834571 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2209173 (Why is no real title available?)
- Metaheuristics. From design to implementation.
- Multicriteria decision aid and artificial intelligence. Links, theory and applications
- Multicriteria Optimization
- The complexity of logic-based abduction
- The computational complexity of abduction
- Towards feasible solutions of the tautology problem
Cited in
(5)- An adaptive reasoning approach towards effficient ordering of composite hypotheses
- Synthetic tableaux: Minimal tableau search heuristics
- An abductive Question-Answer System for the minimal logic of formal inconsistency \(\mathsf{mbC}\)
- On Search for Law-Like Statements as Abductive Hypotheses by Socratic Transformations
- Automated generation of erotetic search scenarios: classification, optimization, and knowledge extraction
This page was built for publication: Identifying efficient abductive hypotheses using multicriteria dominance relation
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2946739)