Improved bounds for the Graham-Pollak problem for hypergraphs
From MaRDI portal
Abstract: For a fixed , let denote the minimum number of complete -partite -graphs needed to partition the complete -graph on vertices. The Graham-Pollak theorem asserts that . An easy construction shows that , and we write for the least number such that . It was known that for each even , but this was not known for any odd value of . In this short note, we prove that . Our method also shows that , answering another open problem.
Recommendations
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3395950 (Why is no real title available?)
- A counting proof of the Graham-Pollak theorem
- A new proof of a theorem of Graham and Pollak
- A polynomial space proof of the Graham-Pollak theorem
- Decomposing the complete \(r\)-graph
- Decomposition of the complete r-graph into complete r-partite r-graphs
- On decompositions of complete hypergraphs
- On the Addressing Problem for Loop Switching
- On the decomposition ofkn into complete bipartite graphs
- Variations on a theme of Graham and Pollak
Cited in
(7)- On the decomposition of random hypergraphs
- The de Bruijn-Erdős theorem for hypergraphs
- Finding biclique partitions of co-chordal graphs
- Bounds for the Graham-Pollak theorem for hypergraphs
- Improved bounds for covering complete uniform hypergraphs
- Improved Bounds for Uniform Hypergraphs without Property B
- Multicovering hypergraphs
This page was built for publication: Improved bounds for the Graham-Pollak problem for hypergraphs
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1691097)