Improved bounds for the Graham-Pollak problem for hypergraphs
Summary: For a fixed \(r\), let \(f_r(n)\) denote the minimum number of complete \(r\)-partite \(r\)-graphs needed to partition the complete \(r\)-graph on \(n\) vertices. The Graham-Pollak theorem asserts that \(f_2(n)=n-1\). An easy construction shows that \(f_r(n) \leqslant (1+o(1))\binom{n}{\lfloor r/2 \rfloor}\), and we write \(c_r\) for the least number such that \(f_r(n) \leq c_r (1+o(1))\binom{n}{\lfloor r/2 \rfloor}\). It was known that \(c_r < 1\) for each even \(r \geq 4\), but this was not known for any odd value of \(r\). In this short note, we prove that \(c_{295}<1\). Our method also shows that \(c_r \rightarrow 0\), answering another open problem.
- A counting proof of the Graham-Pollak theorem
- A new proof of a theorem of Graham and Pollak
- A polynomial space proof of the Graham-Pollak theorem
- Decomposing the complete \(r\)-graph
- Decomposition of the complete r-graph into complete r-partite r-graphs
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3395950 (Why is no real title available?)
- On decompositions of complete hypergraphs
- On the Addressing Problem for Loop Switching
- On the decomposition ofkn into complete bipartite graphs
- Variations on a theme of Graham and Pollak
- Improved bounds for covering complete uniform hypergraphs
- Multicovering hypergraphs
- Bounds for the Graham-Pollak theorem for hypergraphs
- Improved Bounds for Uniform Hypergraphs without Property B
- Finding biclique partitions of co-chordal graphs
- On the decomposition of random hypergraphs
- Odd covers of complete graphs and hypergraphs
- The de Bruijn-Erdős theorem for hypergraphs
This page was built for publication: Improved bounds for the Graham-Pollak problem for hypergraphs
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1691097)