Is reduced integration just a numerical trick

DOI10.1016/0045-7949(88)90401-4MaRDI QIDQ3776781zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Zbigniew Cywinski, Ireneusz Kreja

Publication date 1988

Published in Computers & Structures (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(88)90401-4

zbMATH Keywords

principle of degenerated isoparametric elementsrectangular cross-sectionreduced integrationstiffness matricesstraight in-plane cantilever beamstrain energy effects

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Rods (beams, columns, shafts, arches, rings, etc.) (74K10) Finite element methods applied to problems in solid mechanics (74S05)

Recommendations

• Understanding and improving the reduced integration of Mindlin shell elements
• Reduced minimization theory in beam elements
• Finite element methods for Timoshenko beam, circular arch and Reissner-Mindlin plate problems
• NUMERICAL REDUCED MINIMIZATION THEORY FOR BEAM ELEMENTS UNDER NON-UNIFORM ISOPARAMETRIC MAPPING
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1195569

Cited in

(4)

• Explanation and elimination of shear locking and membrane locking with field consistence approach
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1195569 (Why is no real title available?)
• Reduced minimization theory in beam elements
• NUMERICAL REDUCED MINIMIZATION THEORY FOR BEAM ELEMENTS UNDER NON-UNIFORM ISOPARAMETRIC MAPPING

This page was built for publication: Is reduced integration just a numerical trick

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3776781)