Why you should not use ‘Hybrid’, ‘Power‐Law’ or related exponential schemes for convective modelling—there are much better alternatives (Q4860907)
From MaRDI portal
 | This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: Why you should not use ‘Hybrid’, ‘Power‐Law’ or related exponential schemes for convective modelling—there are much better alternatives |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 831716
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| default for all languages | No label defined |
||
| English | Why you should not use ‘Hybrid’, ‘Power‐Law’ or related exponential schemes for convective modelling—there are much better alternatives |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 831716 |
Statements
Why you should not use ‘Hybrid’, ‘Power‐Law’ or related exponential schemes for convective modelling—there are much better alternatives (English)
0 references
29 January 1996
0 references
effective Reynolds number
0 references
effective Péclet number
0 references
thermally driven cavity flows
0 references
recirculation cells
0 references
0.7871960401535034
0 references
0.760219931602478
0 references
0.7510149478912354
0 references
0.7462907433509827
0 references
