jfa (Q63746)

From MaRDI portal
Statistical Methods for Auditing
Language Label Description Also known as
English
jfa
Statistical Methods for Auditing

    Statements

    0 references
    0.6.5
    21 March 2023
    0 references
    0.6.6
    8 April 2023
    0 references
    0.1.0
    8 January 2020
    0 references
    0.2.0
    5 August 2020
    0 references
    0.3.0
    15 September 2020
    0 references
    0.3.1
    12 October 2020
    0 references
    0.4.0
    30 October 2020
    0 references
    0.5.0
    4 January 2021
    0 references
    0.5.1
    2 March 2021
    0 references
    0.5.2
    2 April 2021
    0 references
    0.5.3
    2 May 2021
    0 references
    0.5.4
    3 June 2021
    0 references
    0.5.5
    1 July 2021
    0 references
    0.5.6
    6 July 2021
    0 references
    0.5.7
    12 August 2021
    0 references
    0.6.0
    22 September 2021
    0 references
    0.6.1
    18 November 2021
    0 references
    0.6.2
    23 January 2022
    0 references
    0.6.3
    21 February 2022
    0 references
    0.6.4
    16 June 2022
    0 references
    0.6.7
    16 July 2023
    0 references
    0.7.0
    4 October 2023
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    4 October 2023
    0 references
    Provides statistical methods for auditing as implemented in JASP for Audit (Derks et al., 2021 <doi:10.21105/joss.02733>). First, the package makes it easy for an auditor to plan a statistical sample, select the sample from the population, and evaluate the misstatement in the sample compliant with international auditing standards. Second, the package provides statistical methods for auditing data, including tests of digit distributions and repeated values. Finally, the package includes methods for auditing algorithms on the aspect of fairness and bias. Next to classical statistical methodology, the package implements Bayesian equivalents of these methods whose statistical underpinnings are described in Derks et al. (2021) <doi:10.1111/ijau.12240>, Derks et al. (2021) <doi:10.31234/osf.io/kzqp5>, and Derks et al. (2022) <doi:10.31234/osf.io/8nf3e>.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references