Jet analysis by deterministic annealing
From MaRDI portal
Abstract: We perform a comparison of two jet clusterization algorithms. The first one is the standard Durham algorithm and the second one is a global optimization scheme, Deterministic Annealing, often used in clusterization problems, and adapted to the problem of jet identification in particle production by high energy collisions; in particular we study hadronic jets in WW production by high energy electron positron scattering. Our results are as follows. First, we find that the two procedures give basically the same output as far as the particle clusterization is concerned. Second, we find that the increase of CPU time with the particle multiplicity is much faster for the Durham jet clustering algorithm in comparison with Deterministic Annealing. Since this result follows from the higher computational complexity of the Durham scheme, it should not depend on the particular process studied here and might be significant for jet physics at LHC as well.
Recommendations
Cites work
Cited in
(10)- Clustering algorithm using space filling curves for the classification of high energy physics data
- FastJet user manual (for version 3.0.2)
- Hierarchical \(\mathsf{k}_{\mathsf{t}}\) jet clustering for parallel architectures
- Parallel k_t jet clustering algorithm
- The anti-\(k_t\) jet clustering algorithm
- Hierarchical clustering with deep q-learning
- Quarks and gluons in the Lund plane
- Automated feature selection procedure for particle jet classification
- Jet reconstruction of individual orbits in many-particle problems
- Adiabatic quantum algorithm for multijet clustering in high energy physics
This page was built for publication: Jet analysis by deterministic annealing
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q699189)