Local antithetic sampling with scrambled nets

From MaRDI portal



Abstract: We consider the problem of computing an approximation to the integral I=int[0,1]df(x)dx. Monte Carlo (MC) sampling typically attains a root mean squared error (RMSE) of O(n−1/2) from n independent random function evaluations. By contrast, quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC) sampling using carefully equispaced evaluation points can attain the rate O(n−1+varepsilon) for any varepsilon>0 and randomized QMC (RQMC) can attain the RMSE O(n−3/2+varepsilon), both under mild conditions on f. Classical variance reduction methods for MC can be adapted to QMC. Published results combining QMC with importance sampling and with control variates have found worthwhile improvements, but no change in the error rate. This paper extends the classical variance reduction method of antithetic sampling and combines it with RQMC. One such method is shown to bring a modest improvement in the RMSE rate, attaining O(n−3/2−1/d+varepsilon) for any varepsilon>0, for smooth enough f.


Many problems in science and engineering require multidimensional quadratures. The Monte Carlo integration can be improved by the use of variance reduction methods. The author extends the classical variance reduction method of antithetic sampling and combine it with randomized quasi-Monte Carlo methods. Several ways of combining and randomized digital nets are considered. The main result is that for any \(\epsilon > 0\) such method reduces the rate of the root mean square error (RMSE) of the integration of smooth integrands to \({\mathcal O}\left( n^{-{3 \over 2} - {1 \over d} + \epsilon}\right),\) where \(d\) is the dimension. In section 2 the information on scrambled nets is reminded. The concepts of \((q,m,d)\)-nets, \((\lambda,q,m,d)\)-nets and \((q,d)\)-sequences in base \(b \geq 2\) are discussed. Techniques of random scrambles as a random linear scrambling, an affine matrix scramble with a different structure of the matrices are presented. The ANOVA decomposition of functions is reminded. In Section 3 \(d\)-dimensional folding operations are used to introduce local antithetic properties into digital nets. Three specific methods -- reflection nets, box folded nets and monomial nets -- are introduced for inducing local antithetic properties in some \((q,m,2)\)-nets. In Section 4 these three methods are illustrated to concrete two-dimensional integrand. In Section 5 the variance for scrambled digital nets quadrature of smooth functions is considered. Theorem 2 shows some upper bounds of the gain coefficients for a \((0,m,d)\)-net, a \((\lambda,0,m,d)\)-net and a \((\lambda,q,m,d)\)-net in base \(b.\) Theorem 3 gives an order \({\mathcal O}\left( n^{-{3 \over 2}} (\log n)^{d-1 \over 2}\right)\) of the RMSE of the integration of smooth functions using a randomized relaxed \((\lambda,q,m,d)\)-net in base \(b.\) In Section 6 the effect of the reflection scheme on a scrambled net is investigated. The concept of the box fold scheme is introduced. Theorem 4 states that for doubly smooth functions under the box folding on a randomized relaxed \((\lambda,0,m,d)\)-net in base \(b\) the RMSE of the integration has an order \({\mathcal O}\left( n^{-{3 \over 2} - {1 \over d}} (\log n)^{d-1 \over 2}\right).\) In Section 7 the box folding scheme is presented as a hybrid of a monomial cubature rule with scrambled net sampling.



Cites work


Cited in
(28)


Describes a project that uses

Uses Software






This page was built for publication: Local antithetic sampling with scrambled nets

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q955143)