Making subsidies work: rules versus discretion

DOI10.3982/ECTA21319MaRDI QIDQ6872448zbMATH OpenFDO

Authors Federico Cingano, Filippo Palomba, Paolo Pinotti, Enrico Rettore

Publication date 20 January 2026

Published in Econometrica (Search for Journal in Brave)

Copyright license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA21319

zbMATH Keywords

employmentinvestmentpolitical discretionpublic subsidiesregression discontinuity

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Game theory, economics, finance, and other social and behavioral sciences (91-XX)

Cites work

• An introduction to statistical learning. With applications in R
• Causal inference for statistics, social, and biomedical sciences. An introduction
• Credit within the firm
• Dealing with limited overlap in estimation of average treatment effects
• Making subsidies work: rules versus discretion
• Manipulation of the running variable in the regression discontinuity design: a density test
• Robust nonparametric confidence intervals for regression-discontinuity designs
• Simple local polynomial density estimators
• Why High-Order Polynomials Should Not Be Used in Regression Discontinuity Designs

Cited in

(1)

• Making subsidies work: rules versus discretion

This page was built for publication: Making subsidies work: rules versus discretion

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6872448)