Maximal subsets free of arithmetic progressions in arbitrary sets
From MaRDI portal
Abstract: We consider the problem of determining the maximum cardinality of a subset containing no arithmetic progressions of length in a given set of size . It is proved that it is sufficient, in a certain sense, to consider the interval . The study continues the work of Koml'os, Sulyok, and Szemer'edi.
Recommendations
- Sets without k‐term progressions can have many shorter progressions
- Small sets which meet all the k(n)-term arithmetic progressions in the interval [1,n]
- A note on maximal progression-free sets
- The number of subsets of integers with no \(k\)-term arithmetic progression
- Progression-free sets in finite abelian groups.
Cites work
- A new proof of Szemerédi's theorem
- Linear problems in combinatorial number theory
- On Sets of Integers Which Contain No Three Terms in Arithmetical Progression
- Szemerédi's theorem and problems on arithmetic progressions
- Thick subsets that do not contain arithmetic progressions
- Translation invariant equations and the method of Sanders
Cited in
(10)- Large subsets of Euclidean space avoiding infinite arithmetic progressions
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5138745 (Why is no real title available?)
- A note on maximal progression-free sets
- The number of subsets of integers with no \(k\)-term arithmetic progression
- The maximum size of subsets forbidding cyclic arithmetic progressions
- When will every maximal \(F\)-free subposet contain a maximal element?
- Number of \(A + B \neq C\) solutions in abelian groups and application to counting independent sets in hypergraphs
- SET MAPPINGS WITH FREE SETS WHICH ARE ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS
- Large minimal sets which force arithmetic progressions
- On the multiplicative Chung-Diaconis-Graham process
This page was built for publication: Maximal subsets free of arithmetic progressions in arbitrary sets
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q679856)