mcca
It contains six common multi-category classification accuracy evaluation measures. All of these measures could be found in Li and Ming (2019) <doi:10.1002/sim.8103>. Specifically, Hypervolume Under Manifold (HUM), described in Li and Fine (2008) <doi:10.1093/biostatistics/kxm050>. Correct Classification Percentage (CCP), Integrated Discrimination Improvement (IDI), Net Reclassification Improvement (NRI), R-Squared Value (RSQ), described in Li, Jiang and Fine (2013) <doi:10.1093/biostatistics/kxs047>. Polytomous Discrimination Index (PDI), described in Van Calster et al. (2012) <doi:10.1007/s10654-012-9733-3>. Li et al. (2018) <doi:10.1177/0962280217692830>. PDI with variance estimation using Dover et al. (2021) <doi:10.1002/sim.9187>. We described all these above measures and our mcca package in Li, Gao and D'Agostino (2019) <doi:10.1002/sim.8103>.
- Assessing the discriminative ability of risk models for more than two outcome categories
- Evaluating classification accuracy for modern learning approaches
- Kernel density estimation in mixture models with known mixture proportions
- Multicategory reclassification statistics for assessing improvements in diagnostic accuracy
- Nonparametric estimation and inference for polytomous discrimination index
- ROC analysis with multiple classes and multiple tests: methodology and its application in microarray studies
This page was built for software: mcca