Model completeness of o-minimal fields with convex valuations
From MaRDI portal
Abstract: We let R be an o-minimal expansion of a field, V a convex subring, and an elementary substructure of (R,V). We let L be the language consisting of a language for R, in which R has elimination of quantifiers, and a predicate for V, and we let be the language L expanded by constants for all elements of . Our main result is that (R,V) considered as an -structure is model complete provided that , the corresponding residue field with structure induced from R, is o-minimal. Along the way we show that o-minimality of implies that the sets definable in are the same as the sets definable in k with structure induced from (R,V). We also give a criterion for a superstructure of (R,V) being an elementary extension of (R,V).
Recommendations
Cites work
- A geometric introduction to forking and thorn-forking
- Embedded o-minimal structures
- Model completeness results for expansions of the ordered field of real numbers by restricted Pfaffian functions and the exponential function
- O-minimal fields with standard part map
- O-minimal residue fields of o-minimal fields
- Real closed rings. II. Model theory
- Triangulation in o-minimal fields with standard part map
Cited in
(7)- Quantifier elimination for o-minimal structures expanded by a valuational cut
- T-convexity and tame extensions
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6315710 (Why is no real title available?)
- O-minimal residue fields of o-minimal fields
- Hausdorff dimension of metric spaces definable in o-minimal expansions of the real field
- Pseudo completions and completions in stages of o-minimal structures
- Measuring definable sets in o-minimal fields
This page was built for publication: Model completeness of o-minimal fields with convex valuations
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5251368)