Multiple model evaluation absent the gold standard through model combination

DOI10.1198/016214507000001012MaRDI QIDQ3071149zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Sining Chen, Edwin S. jun. Iversen, Giovanni Parmigiani

Publication date 1 February 2011

Published in Journal of the American Statistical Association (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1198/016214507000001012

zbMATH Keywords

Bayesian analysisbreast cancer susceptibility genesmeasurement errormodel combinationmodel evaluation

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis (62P10)

Recommendations

• Validating Bayesian prediction models: A case study in genetic susceptibility to breast cancer
• Latent class modeling approaches for assessing diagnostic error without a gold standard: with applications to p53 immunohistochemical assays in bladder tumors
• Model evaluation based on the sampling distribution of estimated absolute prediction error
• Information confidence scores for prediction models
• On Estimating Diagnostic Accuracy From Studies With Multiple Raters and Partial Gold Standard Evaluation

Cited in

(2)

• Estimation of diagnostic test accuracy without full verification: a review of latent class methods
• Reclassification of predictions for uncovering subgroup specific improvement

This page was built for publication: Multiple model evaluation absent the gold standard through model combination

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3071149)