New circular security counterexamples from decision linear and learning with errors
From MaRDI portal
Recommendations
- Three’s Compromised Too: Circular Insecurity for Any Cycle Length from (Ring-)LWE
- Counterexamples to new circular security assumptions underlying iO
- Circular Security Separations for Arbitrary Length Cycles from LWE
- Separating semantic and circular security for symmetric-key bit encryption from the learning with errors assumption
- On the circular security of bit-encryption
Cited in
(13)- Counterexamples to new circular security assumptions underlying iO
- KDM security for identity-based encryption: constructions and separations
- Three’s Compromised Too: Circular Insecurity for Any Cycle Length from (Ring-)LWE
- Circular Security Separations for Arbitrary Length Cycles from LWE
- Separating semantic and circular security for symmetric-key bit encryption from the learning with errors assumption
- Toward fine-grained blackbox separations between semantic and circular-security notions
- Separating IND-CPA and Circular Security for Unbounded Length Key Cycles
- On the security of the multivariate ring learning with errors problem
- Universal amplification of KDM security: from 1-key circular to multi-key KDM
- Lockable obfuscation from circularly insecure fully homomorphic encryption
- SoK: learning with errors, circular security, and fully homomorphic encryption
- Incompressible encryption beyond CPA/CCA security
- Circular insecure encryption: from long cycles to short cycles
This page was built for publication: New circular security counterexamples from decision linear and learning with errors
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2796000)
