Non-local probes do not help with many graph problems
From MaRDI portal
Abstract: This work bridges the gap between distributed and centralised models of computing in the context of sublinear-time graph algorithms. A priori, typical centralised models of computing (e.g., parallel decision trees or centralised local algorithms) seem to be much more powerful than distributed message-passing algorithms: centralised algorithms can directly probe any part of the input, while in distributed algorithms nodes can only communicate with their immediate neighbours. We show that for a large class of graph problems, this extra freedom does not help centralised algorithms at all: for example, efficient stateless deterministic centralised local algorithms can be simulated with efficient distributed message-passing algorithms. In particular, this enables us to transfer existing lower bound results from distributed algorithms to centralised local algorithms.
Recommendations
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7075933
- Best of two local models: centralized local and distributed local algorithms
- Deterministic stateless centralized local algorithms for bounded degree graphs
- On the probe complexity of local computation algorithms
- On the complexity of local distributed graph problems
Cited in
(5)
This page was built for publication: Non-local probes do not help with many graph problems
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1660935)