Nondeterministic tree-walking automata are not closed under complementation
From MaRDI portal
Cites work
- Automata with Nested Pebbles Capture First-Order Logic with Transitive Closure
- Complementing deterministic tree-walking automata
- Complexity of Pebble Tree-Walking Automata
- Complexity of the emptiness problem for graph-walking automata and for tilings with star subgraphs
- Expressive Power of Pebble Automata
- Halting space-bounded computations
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1110839 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1948151 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1408335 (Why is no real title available?)
- It is Undecidable if Two Regular Tree Languages can be Separated by a Deterministic Tree-walking Automaton
- Lower bounds for unambiguous automata via communication complexity
- On complementing unambiguous automata and graphs with many cliques and cocliques
- On the power of tree-walking automata.
- Reversibility of computations in graph-walking automata
- Translations on a context free grammar
- Tree-Walking Automata
- Tree-walking automata cannot be determinized
- Tree-Walking Automata Do Not Recognize All Regular Languages
- Unambiguity in automata theory
This page was built for publication: Nondeterministic tree-walking automata are not closed under complementation
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q7397629)