Not each sequential effect algebra is sharply dominating
From MaRDI portal
Abstract: Let be an effect algebra and be the set of all sharp elements of . is said to be sharply dominating if for each there exists a smallest element such that . In 2002, Professors Gudder and Greechie proved that each -sequential effect algebra is sharply dominating. In 2005, Professor Gudder presented 25 open problems in International Journal of Theoretical Physics, Vol. 44, 2199-2205, the 3th problem asked: Is each sequential effect algebra sharply dominating? Now, we construct an example to answer the problem negatively.
Recommendations
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1453815 (Why is no real title available?)
- Characterization of the sequential product on quantum effects
- Effect algebras and unsharp quantum logics.
- Sequential product of quantum effects
- Sequential products on effect algebras
- Sequential quantum measurements
- States on sharply dominating effect algebras
Cited in
(7)- Remarks on the sequential effect algebras
- A universal property for sequential measurement
- Continuity of the sequential product of sequential quantum effect algebras
- The average value inequality in sequential effect algebras
- Some problems for sequential effect algebras
- Uniformly Archimedean atomic MV-effect algebra is sharply dominating
- Remarks on entropy of partition on the sequential effect algebras
This page was built for publication: Not each sequential effect algebra is sharply dominating
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q653090)