On Regression Sampling in Statistical Auditing: Bad Answers to the Wrong Questions?

DOI10.1111/J.1467-9574.1989.TB01263.XMaRDI QIDQ5750103zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Aart F. de Vos

Publication date 1989

Published in Statistica Neerlandica (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9574.1989.tb01263.x

zbMATH Keywords

Bayesian inferenceconfidence intervalsrare errors

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Sampling theory, sample surveys (62D05) Parametric tolerance and confidence regions (62F25)

Recommendations

• Regression Sampling in Statistical Auditing: A Practical Survey and Evaluation
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2129486
• A Bayesian Solution for a Statistical Auditing Problem
• A Two-Phase Sampling Scheme with Applications to Auditing or Sed Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes?
• Repeated audit controls

Cites work

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3426675 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3597760 (Why is no real title available?)
• Parametric Empirical Bayes Inference: Theory and Applications
• Regression Sampling in Statistical Auditing: A Practical Survey and Evaluation
• Testing precise hypotheses. With comments and a rejoinder by the authors
• Why Isn't Everyone a Bayesian?

Cited in

(4)

• Statistical auditing of non-transparent expert assessments
• Regression Sampling in Statistical Auditing: A Practical Survey and Evaluation
• A Bayesian Solution for a Statistical Auditing Problem
• Overpayment models for medical audits: multiple scenarios

This page was built for publication: On Regression Sampling in Statistical Auditing: Bad Answers to the Wrong Questions?

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5750103)