On not changing the problem: a reply to Howson

DOI10.1080/02698595.2011.605250MaRDI QIDQ4911852zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Daniel Steel

Publication date 20 March 2013

Published in International Studies in the Philosophy of Science (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1080/02698595.2011.605250

zbMATH Keywords

formal learning theoryHume's problem of induction

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Logic in the philosophy of science (03A10)

Recommendations

• No answer to Hume
• What If the Principle of Induction Is Normative? Formal Learning Theory and Hume’s Problem
• Induction: a logical analysis
• On a famous problem of induction
• Goodman's ``new riddle

Cites work

• No answer to Hume
• Ockham's razor, empirical complexity, and truth-finding efficiency
• What If the Principle of Induction Is Normative? Formal Learning Theory and Hume’s Problem

Cited in

(6)

• Induction: a logical analysis
• Broader issues at stake. A reponse to Elkan
• Evidence, significance, and counterfactuals: Schramm on the new riddle of induction
• No answer to Hume
• Justification of induction: Russell and Jin Yuelin. A comparative study
• Two Problems of Induction

This page was built for publication: On not changing the problem: a reply to Howson

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4911852)