On removable sets for convex functions
From MaRDI portal
Abstract: In the present article we provide a sufficient condition for a closed set F in R^d to have the following property which we call c-removability: Whenever a function f:R^d->R is locally convex on the complement of F, it is convex on the whole R^d. We also prove that no generalized rectangle of positive Lebesgue measure in R^2 is c-removable. Our results also answer the following question asked in an article by Jacek Tabor and Jozef Tabor [J. Math. Anal. Appl. 365 (2010)]: Assume the closed set F in R^d is such that any locally convex function defined on R^dF has a unique convex extension on R^d. Is F necessarily intervally thin (a notion of smallness of sets defined by their "essential transparency" in every direction)? We prove the answer is negative by finding a counterexample in R^2.
Recommendations
Cites work
- Extensions of convex and semiconvex functions and intervally thin sets
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 589174 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 739280 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3280855 (Why is no real title available?)
- Nonconvex Lipschitz function in plane which is locally convex outside a discontinuum.
Cited in
(7)- Removable sets for intrinsic metric and for holomorphic functions
- Removable sets for the poincare inequality on metric spaces
- Convex decompositions and the valence of some functions
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3077277 (Why is no real title available?)
- A reduction theorem for inequalities involving convex functions and its applications
- Extensions of convex and semiconvex functions and intervally thin sets
- Vitushkin's conjecture for removable sets
This page was built for publication: On removable sets for convex functions
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2338895)