On the impossibility of non-static quantum bit commitment between two parties

DOI10.1007/S11128-011-0259-5MaRDI QIDQ424242zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Cheng-Qing Li, Dong-Yang Long, Qin Li, W. H. Chan, Chunhui Wu

Publication date 31 May 2012

Published in Quantum Information Processing (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1101.5684

zbMATH Keywords

quantum cryptographyquantum bit commitment

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Cryptography (94A60) Quantum cryptography (quantum-theoretic aspects) (81P94)

Abstract: Recently, Choi emph{et al}. proposed an assumption on Mayers-Lo-Chau (MLC) no-go theorem that the state of the entire quantum system is invariable to both participants before the unveiling phase. This means that the theorem is only applicable to static quantum bit commitment (QBC). This paper find that the assumption is unnecessary and the MLC no-go theorem can be applied to not only static QBC, but also non-static one. A non-static QBC protocol proposed by Choi emph{et al.} is briefly reviewed and analyzed to work as a supporting example. In addition, a novel way to prove the impossibility of the two kinds of QBC is given.

Recommendations

• A short impossibility proof of quantum bit commitment
• QUANTUM BIT COMMITMENT WITH SECRET PARAMETERS
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1302858
• Why quantum bit commitment and ideal quantum coin tossing are impossible.
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1283995

Cites work

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 503241 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1030985 (Why is no real title available?)
• Bit commitment using pseudorandomness
• Dilemma that cannot be resolved by biased quantum coin flipping
• Fidelity for Mixed Quantum States
• Minimum disclosure proofs of knowledge
• Perfect zero-knowledge arguments for NP using any one-way permutation
• Quantum Oblivious Transfer
• Quantum cryptography based on Bell’s theorem
• Quantum cryptography using any two nonorthogonal states
• Quantum cryptography: public key distribution and coin tossing
• Secure classical bit commitment using fixed capacity communication channels

Cited in

(3)

• Unconditionally secure quantum bit commitment based on the uncertainty principle
• The physics of no-bit-Commitment: Generalized quantum non-locality versus oblivious transfer
• Cheat sensitive quantum bit commitment via pre- and post-selected quantum states

This page was built for publication: On the impossibility of non-static quantum bit commitment between two parties

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q424242)