On the qualitative comparison of decisions having positive and negative features
From MaRDI portal
Recommendations
Cited in
(18)- From fine-grained properties to broad principles for gradual argumentation: a principled spectrum
- Residuated variants of Sugeno integrals: towards new weighting schemes for qualitative aggregation methods
- Mathematical morphology on bipolar fuzzy sets: general algebraic framework
- Evaluation of argument strength in attack graphs: foundations and semantics
- Qualitative capacities: basic notions and potential applications
- Bipolar aggregation using the uninorms
- Qualitative bipolar decision rules: toward more expressive settings
- Qualitative integrals and desintegrals: how to handle positive and negative scales in evaluation
- Asymmetric integral as a limit of generated Choquet integrals based on absolutely monotone real set functions
- Gradualness, uncertainty and bipolarity: making sense of fuzzy sets
- The role of fuzzy sets in decision sciences: old techniques and new directions
- Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
- Evaluation of arguments in weighted bipolar graphs
- Artificial intelligence and high-level cognition
- Bipolar Sugeno integrals, if-then rules and preference orderings
- On generalized notions of consistency and reinstatement and their preservation in formal argumentation
- Qualitative heuristics for balancing the pros and cons
- The balancing Choquet integral
This page was built for publication: On the qualitative comparison of decisions having positive and negative features
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3624135)