On the relative proof complexity of deep inference via atomic flows

From MaRDI portal



Abstract: We consider the proof complexity of the minimal complete fragment, KS, of standard deep inference systems for propositional logic. To examine the size of proofs we employ atomic flows, diagrams that trace structural changes through a proof but ignore logical information. As results we obtain a polynomial simulation of versions of Resolution, along with some extensions. We also show that these systems, as well as bounded-depth Frege systems, cannot polynomially simulate KS, by giving polynomial-size proofs of certain variants of the propositional pigeonhole principle in KS.











This page was built for publication: On the relative proof complexity of deep inference via atomic flows

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5177335)