Optimality of group testing with differential misclassification
From MaRDI portal
Cites work
- Efficient estimation of the prevalence of multiple rare traits
- Exact Confidence Intervals for Proportions Estimated by Group Testing
- Group testing with a dilution effect
- Group testing with a new goal, estimation
- Incorporating retesting outcomes for estimation of disease prevalence
- Maximally Efficient Two‐Stage Screening
- Nonparametric estimation of distributions and diagnostic accuracy based on group‐tested results with differential misclassification
- On the informativeness and accuracy of pooled testing in estimating prevalence of a rare disease: Application to HIV screening
- Optimal Group Testing Designs for Estimating Prevalence with Uncertain Testing Errors
- Optimality of group testing in the presence of misclassification
- Pairwise comparisons for proportions estimated by pooled testing
- Regression Models for Disease Prevalence with Diagnostic Tests on Pools of Serum Samples
- Robustness of Group Testing in the Estimation of Proportions
This page was built for publication: Optimality of group testing with differential misclassification
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q7022332)