Ownership types for object encapsulation
From MaRDI portal
Recommendations
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3511563 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 615137 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1942450 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1948151 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1953123 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 941396 (Why is no real title available?)
- Regular expression pattern matching for XML
- Types and programing languages
Cited in
(18)- Combining traits with boxes and ownership types in a Java-like setting
- Confinement framework for encapsulating objects
- On assertion-based encapsulation for object invariants and simulations
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1728235 (Why is no real title available?)
- Gradual ownership types
- Ownership confinement ensures representation independence for object-oriented programs
- Infering Ownership Types for Encapsulated Object-Oriented Program Components
- Universe Types for Topology and Encapsulation
- Spatial-Behavioral Types, Distributed Services, and Resources
- Existential Quantification for Variant Ownership
- Refactoring and representation independence for class hierarchies
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1037478 (Why is no real title available?)
- JAC—Access right based encapsulation for Java
- Protecting representation with effect encapsulation
- Ownership guided C to Rust translation
- Towards imperative modules: reasoning about invariants and sharing of mutable state
- Observational purity and encapsulation
- Implicit ownership types for memory management
This page was built for publication: Ownership types for object encapsulation
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2942927)