PR-box correlations have no classical limit
From MaRDI portal
Abstract: One of Yakir Aharonov's endlessly captivating physics ideas is the conjecture that two axioms, namely relativistic causality ("no superluminal signalling") and nonlocality, so nearly contradict each other that a unique theory - quantum mechanics - reconciles them. But superquantum (or "PR-box") correlations imply that quantum mechanics is not the most nonlocal theory (in the sense of nonlocal correlations) consistent with relativistic causality. Let us consider supplementing these two axioms with a minimal third axiom: there exists a classical limit in which macroscopic observables commute. That is, just as quantum mechanics has a classical limit, so must any generalization of quantum mechanics. In this classical limit, PR-box correlations violate relativistic causality. Generalized to all stronger-than-quantum bipartite correlations, this result is a derivation of Tsirelson's bound without assuming quantum mechanics.
Recommendations
Cited in
(8)- The Cabello nonlocality argument is stronger control than the Hardy nonlocality argument for detecting post-quantum correlations in the bipartite systems
- Local randomness in Cabello's non-locality argument from the information causality principle
- A reasonable thing that just might work
- Bell correlations and the common future
- A glance beyond the quantum model
- The problem of quantum correlations and the totalitarian principle
- Why a relativistic quantum mechanical world must be indeterministic
- An effective way of characterizing the quantum nonlocality
This page was built for publication: PR-box correlations have no classical limit
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2873360)