pairwiseLLM
Provides a unified framework for generating, submitting, and analyzing pairwise comparisons of writing quality using large language models (LLMs). The package supports live and/or batch evaluation workflows across multiple providers ('OpenAI', 'Anthropic', 'Google Gemini', 'Together AI', and locally-hosted 'Ollama' models), includes bias-tested prompt templates and a flexible template registry, and offers tools for constructing forward and reversed comparison sets to analyze consistency and positional bias. The package additionally supports adaptive pairing workflows that iteratively select comparisons based on model uncertainty to improve ranking efficiency. Results can be modeled using frequentist or Bayesian Bradley–Terry–Luce models (Bradley & Terry, 1952 <doi:10.2307/2334029>; see also Caron & Doucet, 2012 <doi:10.1080/10618600.2012.638220>) or Elo rating methods (see Clark et al., 2018 <doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0190393>) to derive writing quality scores. For information on pairwise comparisons and comparative judgement, see Thurstone (1927) <doi:10.1037/h0070288> and Heldsinger & Humphry (2010) <doi:10.1007/BF03216919>.
- A law of comparative judgment.
- Efficient Bayesian Inference for Generalized Bradley–Terry Models
- Rank Analysis of Incomplete Block Designs: I. The Method of Paired Comparisons
- Using the method of pairwise comparison to obtain reliable teacher assessments
- Why rate when you could compare? Using the “EloChoice” package to assess pairwise comparisons of perceived physical strength
This page was built for software: pairwiseLLM
