Partial impredicativity in reverse mathematics

From MaRDI portal



Abstract: In reverse mathematics, is is possible to have a curious situation where we know that an implication does not reverse, but appear to have no information on on how to weaken the assumption while preserving the conclusion. A main cause of this phenomenon is the proof of a Pi21 sentence from the theory {Pioo}. Using methods based on the functional interpretation, we introduce a family of weakenings of {Pioo} and use them to give new upper bounds for the Nash-Williams Theorem of wqo theory and Menger's Theorem for countable graphs.












This page was built for publication: Partial impredicativity in reverse mathematics

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5300073)