Pathwidth vs Cocircumference
From MaRDI portal
Abstract: The {em circumference} of a graph with at least one cycle is the length of a longest cycle in . A classic result of Birmel'e (2003) states that the treewidth of is at most its circumference minus . In case is -connected, this upper bound also holds for the pathwidth of ; in fact, even the treedepth of is upper bounded by its circumference (Bria'nski, Joret, Majewski, Micek, Seweryn, Sharma; 2023). In this paper, we study whether similar bounds hold when replacing the circumference of by its {em cocircumference}, defined as the largest size of a {em bond} in , an inclusion-wise minimal set of edges such that has more components than . In matroidal terms, the cocircumference of is the circumference of the bond matroid of . Our first result is the following `dual' version of Birmel'e's theorem: The treewidth of a graph is at most its cocircumference. Our second and main result is an upper bound of on the pathwidth of a -connected graph with cocircumference . Contrary to circumference, no such bound holds for the treedepth of . Our two upper bounds are best possible up to a constant factor.
Recommendations
Cites work
- Approximation of pathwidth of outerplanar graphs
- Branchwidth of graphic matroids
- First order convergence of matroids
- Graph minors. X: Obstructions to tree-decomposition
- Matroid Pathwidth and Code Trellis Complexity
- New spectral lower bounds on the bisection width of graphs
- On infinite antichains of matroids
- On Rota's conjecture and excluded minors containing large projective geometries.
- Tree-width and circumference of graphs
- Treedepth vs circumference
This page was built for publication: Pathwidth vs Cocircumference
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6195950)