Practical Implications of Modes of Statistical Inference for Causal Effects and the Critical Role of the Assignment Mechanism
From MaRDI portal
Cited in
(13)- Confounding and collapsibility in causal inference
- Choice as an alternative to control in observational studies. (With comments and a rejoinder).
- Comparing different propensity score estimation methods for estimating the marginal causal effect through standardization to propensity scores
- %CEM: a SAS macro to perform coarsened exact matching
- Causal inference for quantile treatment effects
- Analysis of repeated low-dose challenge studies
- Randomization inference for treatment effects on a binary outcome
- Quantile causal mediation analysis allowing longitudinal data
- Response to comment on: ``Randomization inference for treatment effects on a binary outcome
- Relaxed covariate overlap and margin-based causal effect estimation
- Causal inference targeting a concentration index for studies of health inequalities
- The essential role of pair matching in cluster-randomized experiments, with application to the Mexican Universal Health Insurance evaluation
- Non-parametric inference for the effect of a treatment on survival times with application in the health and social sciences
This page was built for publication: Practical Implications of Modes of Statistical Inference for Causal Effects and the Critical Role of the Assignment Mechanism
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4696413)