Probing the Quantitative-Qualitative Divide in Probabilistic Reasoning
From MaRDI portal
Abstract: This paper explores the space of (propositional) probabilistic logical languages, ranging from a purely `qualitative' comparative language to a highly `quantitative' language involving arbitrary polynomials over probability terms. While talk of qualitative vs. quantitative may be suggestive, we identify a robust and meaningful boundary in the space by distinguishing systems that encode (at most) additive reasoning from those that encode additive and multiplicative reasoning. The latter includes not only languages with explicit multiplication but also languages expressing notions of dependence and conditionality. We show that the distinction tracks a divide in computational complexity: additive systems remain complete for , while multiplicative systems are robustly complete for . We also address axiomatic questions, offering several new completeness results as well as a proof of non-finite-axiomatizability for comparative probability. Repercussions of our results for conceptual and empirical questions are addressed, and open problems are discussed.
Cited in
(7)- Measurement-theoretic foundations of logic of qualitative conditional probability
- On probabilistic and causal reasoning with summation operators
- Measurement-theoretic foundations of logic of inexact knowledge
- An `elementary' perspective on reasoning about probability spaces
- Infinitary calculus for first-order logic of probability with distribution on the domain
- Sharpening complexity results in quantified probability logic
- On the decision problem for quantified probability logics
This page was built for publication: Probing the Quantitative-Qualitative Divide in Probabilistic Reasoning
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6443385)