Problems for logical pluralism

DOI10.1080/01445340.2012.749030MaRDI QIDQ4983336zbMATH OpenOpenAlexWikidataFDO

Authors Owen Griffiths

Publication date 25 March 2015

Published in History and Philosophy of Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1080/01445340.2012.749030

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05)

Recommendations

• Restall and Beall on logical pluralism: a critique
• What logical pluralism cannot be
• Logical pluralism
• The collapse of logical pluralism has been greatly exaggerated
• From natural to formal language: a case for logical pluralism

Cites work

• Did Tarski commit “Tarski's fallacy”?
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3162889 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 51086 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2188773 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3057869 (Why is no real title available?)
• One true logic?
• PLURALISM IN LOGIC
• Quantification and the empty domain
• The medieval theory of consequence
• Universally free logic and standard quantification theory

Cited in

(12)

• Restall's proof-theoretic pluralism and relevance logic
• The collapse of logical pluralism has been greatly exaggerated
• From natural to formal language: a case for logical pluralism
• PLURALISM IN LOGIC
• Logical pluralism
• What logical pluralism cannot be
• Pluralism and proofs
• Restall and Beall on logical pluralism: a critique
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7594201 (Why is no real title available?)
• Pluralistic perspectives on logic: an introduction
• Why logical pluralism?
• Should pluralists be pluralists about pluralism?

This page was built for publication: Problems for logical pluralism

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4983336)