Projective sets, intuitionistically

From MaRDI portal



Abstract: We study `definable' subsets of Baire space mathcalN. The logic of our arguments is intuitionistic and we use L.E.J.~Brouwer's Thesis on bars in mathcalN and his continuity axioms. We avoid the operation of taking the complement of a subset of mathcalN. A subset of mathcalN is mathbfSigma11 or: analytic if it is the projection of a closed subset of mathcalN. Important mathbfSigma11 set are the set of the codes of all closed and located subsets of mathcalN that are positively uncountable and the set of the codes of all located and closed subsets of mathcalN containing at least one member coding a (positively) infinite subset of mathbbN. A subset of mathcalN is strictly analytic if it is the projection of a closed and located subset of mathcalN. Brouwer's Thesis on bars in mathcalN proves separation and boundedness theorems for strictly analytic subsets of mathcalN. A subset of mathcalN is mathbfPi11 or: co-analytic if it is the co-projection of an open subset of mathcalNimesmathcalN=mathcalN. There is no symmetry between analytic and co-analytic sets like in classical descriptive set theory. An important mathbfPi11 set is the set of the codes of all closed and located subsets of mathcalN all of whose members code an almost-finite subset of mathbbN. The set of the codes of closed and located subsets of mathcalN that are almost-countable, or, equivalently, {reducible in Cantor's sense, is treated at some length. This set is probably not mathbfPi11. The projective hierarchy collapses: every (positively) projective set is mathbfSigma21: the projection of a co-analytic subset of mathcalN.




Cites work









This page was built for publication: Projective sets, intuitionistically

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6170638)