Updating our beliefs about inconsistency: The Monty-Hall case
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1005764
DOI10.1016/J.MATHSOCSCI.2008.08.006zbMATH Open1155.91327OpenAlexW1963650183MaRDI QIDQ1005764FDOQ1005764
Publication date: 10 March 2009
Published in: Mathematical Social Sciences (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2008.08.006
Cites Work
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- The hierarchical approach to modeling knowledge and common knowledge
- Epistemic properties of knowledge hierarchies
- Can Bayes' rule be justified by cognitive rationality principles?
- Evidence, knowledge, and belief functions
- Indifference, neutrality and informativeness: Generalizing the three prisoners paradox
- The Car and the Goats
- Conditionals, Imaging, and Subjunctive Probability
Cited In (2)
Recommendations
- Title not available (Why is that?) 👍 👎
- Updating Choquet beliefs 👍 👎
- On the revision of probabilistic beliefs using uncertain evidence 👍 👎
- Subjective probability, confidence, and Bayesian updating 👍 👎
- Reexamination on updating Choquet beliefs 👍 👎
- Consequentialism and dynamic consistency in updating ambiguous beliefs 👍 👎
- BELIEF REVISION, PROBABILISM, AND LOGIC CHOICE 👍 👎
- Revising probabilities and full beliefs 👍 👎
- A Bayesian interpretation of the Monty Hall problem with epistemic uncertainty 👍 👎
- The Rationality of Irrationality in the Monty Hall Problem 👍 👎
This page was built for publication: Updating our beliefs about inconsistency: The Monty-Hall case
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1005764)
