Aggregation of direct and indirect judgments in pairwise comparison matrices with a re-examination of the criticisms by Bana e Costa and Vansnick
From MaRDI portal
(Redirected from Publication:1007848)
Recommendations
- Contribution of individual judgments toward inconsistency in pairwise comparisons
- A note on consistent adjustments of pairwise comparison judgments
- A heuristic method to rectify intransitive judgments in pairwise comparison matrices
- Analysis of pairwise comparison matrices: an empirical research
- An experiment on the consistency of aggregated comparison matrices in AHP
- Selective assessment of judgmental inconsistencies in pairwise comparisons for group decision rating
- On the conjoint estimation of inconsistency and intransitivity of pairwise comparisons
- A note on the analysis of subjective judgement matrices
- Investigation of the aggregation effectiveness of expert estimates obtained by the pairwise comparison method
Cites work
Cited in
(8)- Checking and adjusting order-consistency of linguistic pairwise comparison matrices for getting transitive preference relations
- Interactive consistency correction in the analytic hierarchy process to preserve ranks
- An improved statistical approach for consistency test in AHP
- Eigenvector ranking method as a measuring tool: formulas for errors
- Consistency and consensus improving methods for pairwise comparison matrices based on abelian linearly ordered group
- A semiring-based study of judgment matrices: properties and models
- Goal programming approaches to deriving interval weights based on interval fuzzy preference relations
- The state-of-the-art integrations and applications of the analytic hierarchy process
This page was built for publication: Aggregation of direct and indirect judgments in pairwise comparison matrices with a re-examination of the criticisms by Bana e Costa and Vansnick
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1007848)