Is perceptual space inherently non-Euclidean?

DOI10.1016/J.JMP.2008.12.006zbMATH Open1159.91477OpenAlexW2122688798WikidataQ43104938 ScholiaQ43104938MaRDI QIDQ1015249FDOQ1015249

Authors: Julian Martin Fernandez, Bart Farell 

Publication date: 7 May 2009

Published in: Journal of Mathematical Psychology (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: http://europepmc.org/articles/pmc2702877

Recommendations

• Publication:4887822
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3951465
• How problematic is the near-Euclidean spatial geometry of the large-scale universe?
• The cognitive bases of geometry and the perception of space
• Cognitive bases of geometry and the perception of space
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 780749

zbMATH Keywords

Bayesianmaximum likelihoodcue combinationEuclideandepth perceptionspace perception

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Psychophysics and psychophysiology; perception (91E30)

Cites Work

• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Visual perception of rigidity of solid shape

Cited In (4)

• The cognitive bases of geometry and the perception of space
• Cognitive bases of geometry and the perception of space
• A proposal for a Riemannian face space and application to atypical vs. typical face similarities
• Is There Something Out There? Inferring Space from Sensorimotor Dependencies

This page was built for publication: Is perceptual space inherently non-Euclidean?

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1015249)