Defense of ``Impossibility of distant indirect measurement of the quantum Zeno effect
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1017330
DOI10.1016/J.PHYSLETA.2006.04.004zbMATH Open1160.81361arXivquant-ph/0603030OpenAlexW2158653322MaRDI QIDQ1017330FDOQ1017330
Authors: Masanao Ozawa 
Publication date: 18 May 2009
Published in: Physics Letters. A (Search for Journal in Brave)
Abstract: Recently, Wallentowitz and Toschek [Phys. Rev. A 69, 046101 (2005)] criticized the assertion made by Hotta and Morikawa [Phys. Rev. A 69, 052114 (2004)] that distant indirect measurements do not cause the quantum Zeno effect, and claimed that their proof is faulty and that their claim is unfounded. Here, it is shown that the argument given by Wallentowitz and Toschek includes a mathematical flaw and that their criticism is unfounded.
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0603030
Recommendations
- The quantum Zeno effect: a solvable model for indirect pre-measurements
- Decoherence in generalized measurement and the quantum Zeno paradox
- Quantum Zeno effect: relevance for local realism, macroscopic realism, and non-invasive measurability at the macroscopic level.
- Quantum Zeno effect by incomplete measurements
- Quantum Zeno effect in spontaneous decay with distant detector
- Passive Quantum Measurement: Arrival Time, Quantum Zeno Effect and Gambler's Fallacy
- Revisiting quantum Zeno effect and anti-Zeno effect: universality vs non-universality
- The problem of measurement in quantum physics: An evaluation of the extant proofs of insolubility
- Influence of the finite duration of a measurement on the quantum Zeno effect
Cites Work
Cited In (2)
This page was built for publication: Defense of ``Impossibility of distant indirect measurement of the quantum Zeno effect
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1017330)
