Analysing the performance of bootstrap neural tests for conditional heteroskedasticity in ARCH-M models
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1019875
DOI10.1016/j.csda.2006.08.025zbMath1161.62405OpenAlexW1988446943MaRDI QIDQ1019875
Carole Siani, Christian de Peretti
Publication date: 29 May 2009
Published in: Computational Statistics and Data Analysis (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2006.08.025
Time series, auto-correlation, regression, etc. in statistics (GARCH) (62M10) Nonparametric statistical resampling methods (62G09) Neural nets and related approaches to inference from stochastic processes (62M45) Graphical methods in statistics (62A09)
Related Items (2)
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Testing for neglected nonlinearity in time series models. A comparison of neural network methods and alternative tests
- A comparison of the power of some tests for conditional heteroscedasticity
- Neural Tests for Conditional Heteroskedasticity in ARCH-M Models
- Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity with Estimates of the Variance of United Kingdom Inflation
- A TEST FOR CONDITIONAL HETEROSKEDASTICITY IN TIME SERIES MODELS
- Hypothesis Testing When a Nuisance Parameter is Present Only Under the Alternative
- A test for the presence of conditional heteroskedasticity within arch-m framework
- Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds
This page was built for publication: Analysing the performance of bootstrap neural tests for conditional heteroskedasticity in ARCH-M models