Upper triangular operator matrices, SVEP and Browder, Weyl theorems

From MaRDI portal
Publication:1035207

DOI10.1007/S00020-008-1648-8zbMATH Open1236.47004arXiv0812.2667OpenAlexW2593092117MaRDI QIDQ1035207FDOQ1035207


Authors: B. P. Duggal Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 2 November 2009

Published in: Integral Equations and Operator Theory (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: A Banach space operator TinB(calX) is polaroid if points lambdainisosigmasigma(T) are poles of the resolvent of T. Let sigmaa(T), sigmaw(T), sigmaaw(T), sigmaSF+(T) and sigmaSF(T) denote, respectively, the approximate point, the Weyl, the Weyl essential approximate, the upper semi--Fredholm and lower semi--Fredholm spectrum of T. For A, B and CinB(calX), let MC denote the operator matrix . If A is polaroid on pi0(MC)=lambdainisosigma(MC)0<dim(MClambda)1(0)<infty, M0 satisfies Weyl's theorem, and A and B satisfy either of the hypotheses (i) A has SVEP at points lambdainsigmaw(M0)setminussigmaSF+(A) and B has SVEP at points muinsigmaw(M0)setminussigmaSF(B), or, (ii) both A and A have SVEP at points lambdainsigmaw(M0)setminussigmaSF+(A), or, (iii) A has SVEP at points lambdainsigmaw(M0)setminussigmaSF+(A) and B* has SVEP at points muinsigmaw(M0)setminussigmaSF(B), then sigma(MC)setminussigmaw(MC)=pi0(MC). Here the hypothesis that lambdainpi0(MC) are poles of the resolvent of A can not be replaced by the hypothesis lambdainpi0(A) are poles of the resolvent of A. For an operator TinB(X), let pi0a(T)=lambda:lambdainisosigmaa(T),0<dim(Tlambda)1(0)<infty. We prove that if A and B* have SVEP, A is polaroid on pi0a(M) and B is polaroid on pi0a(B), then sigmaa(M)setminussigmaaw(M)=pi0a(M).


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/0812.2667




Recommendations





Cited In (25)





This page was built for publication: Upper triangular operator matrices, SVEP and Browder, Weyl theorems

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1035207)