Comparing multiple treatments to both positive and negative controls

DOI10.1016/j.jspi.2009.07.001zbMath1353.62081OpenAlexW1994886343MaRDI QIDQ1036717

Eleanne Solorzano, Nairanjana Dasgupta, Tie Jun Tong

Publication date: 13 November 2009

Published in: Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspi.2009.07.001

zbMATH Keywords

least favorable configurationmultiple comparisonpositive controllog concavitynegative control

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Optimal statistical designs (62K05) Paired and multiple comparisons; multiple testing (62J15)

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Weighted A-optimal block designs for comparing test treatments with controls with unequal precision
• Optimal allocation for comparing \(k\) test treatments to positive and negative control with unequal weighting under A-optimality and MV-optimality
• Optimal designs for comparing test treatments with controls. With comments and a rejoinder by the authors
• Multiple comparison procedures for optimally discriminating between good, equivalent, and bad treatments with respect to a control
• Log-concave probability and its applications
• A Multiple Comparison Procedure for Comparing Several Treatments with a Control
• Optimal Designs for Comparing the Variances of Several Treatments with That of a Standard Treatment
• Multiple Comparisons Emphasizing Selected Contrasts: An Extension and Generalization of Dunnett's Procedure
• One-sided simultaneous comparisons with more than one control
• Using numerical methods to find the least favorable configuration when comparingktest treatments with both positive and negative controls